The Information Technology field has co-opted the title 'Architect'. How did this happen?
In the state of Connecticut, for example, in order to call yourself an Architect you have to be registered by the Architectural Licensing Board, which is part of the Department of Consumer Protection. The State proclaims in its General Statutes and Regulations that "...no person shall practice architecture in this state, except as provided in this chapter,
or use the title "architect", or display or use any words, letters, figures, title, sign, seal,
advertisement or other device to indicate that such person practices or offers to practice
architecture, unless such person has obtained a license..."
So how is it that in a recent search for Architect positions near my Zip Code only three of the 102 job offerings were for someone with an actual background in the legal practice of Architecture? This has not gone unnoticed. Earlier this summer, Architect magazine ran an article on the subject: I'm an Architect. The author has resigned himself to the apparent acquiescence by the American Institute of Architects (our lofty Professional Society) in the matter.
I'm less sanguine on the subject, I guess. This can't be right. Now, if only I could find a way to make the buggers pay for what they've done. They can credit my PayPal account. OK?
No comments:
Post a Comment