Now Presenting ...

LXDi

Check it out: Linowes Executive Development Institute.  The very heady name for Joanne Linowes' organization devoted to coaching for quality presentations and professional development. Specifically - get her book The Savvy Presenter.  If you read this blog, you may recall that I won my copy by correctly answering her monthly quiz question.

I first met Joanne when a mutual client hired us to help with an important presentation. I was there because I knew the context. She knew HOW to present.  It was a stimulating experience.  I think I learned as much as our client, and I look forward to more encounters.

Her book - written in an appropriately breezy tone - claims to be organized around 100 tips. The fact is there is much more than that in the narrative. I thought I was experienced, but now know better. Tip #16: "Anticipate potential boomerangs" is one of my favorites.  In fairness to Joanne, you should buy the book to see what it's all about.

Find Joanne at www.lxdi.com and www.savvypresenter.com

You won't regret it.

IPD ... Not!

There I was - listening to a panel discussion led by an AGC representative.  Seven leaders from seven major construction companies.  Not a one has done a real, honest-to-goodness three-party Integrated Project Delivery contract.

I asked many of them directly why not.  The answers were varied:

• The lawyers hate them
• They can't be done by public agencies
• They will only happen when an owner drives the process
• Nobody wants to give up the ability to have a contract with recourse

Actually, they're all mostly true.

This idea has now been around for a number of years, and may continue to gain steam; but implementation has been arduous. There was interesting contrast to IDP during the evening - BIM. The implementation of this software and technology is now seen as SOP - almost mandatory.  Noone disagreed.

Why? BIM implementation has demonstrated positive consequences. But, importantly, its use doesn't seriously alter the contractual relationship of the typical three parties. (OK, I know - there's always the argument about "who owns the model?")

Now - I like cooperative ventures as much as the next person. Continuing the IPD conversation advances that concept. I just won't hold my breath waiting for the contracts to appear.

The Best Two Weeks Of The Year

Every spring, I look forward to the blooming of the magnolia tree in the front yard.  It arrived a full month early!  I sit at my desk and, as it is every year, watch the buds form, grow larger day by day before they explode - sometimes overnight.  It's glorious, and vaguely spiritual.

A few weeks ago, my neighbor asked if he could trim some of the branches that were hanging low over his driveway.  A reasonable enough request, but I was uneasy.  We cordially negotiated a compromise that  wasn't too severe, but I was still somewhat pained.  Fewer flowers to enjoy, I suppose.

Now, I see the petals starting to fall to the ground.  Sadly, it's the inevitable passage.  The coming greenery, of course, lasts all summer into the fall.  Pleasant enough, just not as exhilarating as these precious two weeks.  If I were more poetic, I might be able to aptly describe a metaphor for the seasonal change.  Lacking that, I just enjoy.

Each year I take a picture.  The most recent is shared above.  Looking close, you can see why the business is "No Left Turn".  The glancing morning sunlight caught the sign just enough to make it glow - almost ostentatiously.  The tree is more appealing, I think.

Happy Spring.

Equivalent?

Yesterday I attended a conference where an Architect and the College client proudly boasted about their new "LEED Silver equivalent" building under construction.

No - it wasn't LEED (c), or LEED Certified, or even generically "Green" - just "equivalent".  Now, although I'm a LEED AP myself, and committed to all the important design principles; I have some sympathy for those unprepared to deal with the fees and bureaucracy of the USGBC approval process.  Nevertheless, it seems disingenuous to use this "equivalent" phrase.

Let's say I graduated from Architecture School, went through years of apprenticeship; but didn't feel like taking the exam.  Would anybody care if I called myself "Registered Equivalent"?  I'm pretty sure the answer is yes.

Are we condoning the facilities version of street sale Gucci bags?  Who's to know?  The sincerity and honesty of the designers and clients are the only validation.  Is this good enough?

My suspicion is that it may resolve itself when the USGBC takes someone on legally.  It'll be an interesting fight to watch.

How savvy are you?

Me?  Sometimes not so much.

Imagine my surprise when I was the winner of my friend Joanne Linowes' monthly challenge question.  My prize is a copy of her book, The Savvy Presenter.

If you want to give it your go, you have to get on her e-mail list, which you can do at her website by the same name: http://www.savvypresenter.com/ .  It's there you can register for her Tip on the 10th.

It was my pleasure to work with Joanne as we were both hired as coaches for a CM hoping to gain an edge as they prepared for a crucial interview presentation.  I learned as much as our client, I suspect.

Take a look!

What's the Point? Power?

So - here we are.  There are two of us (my co-presenter and I), and nine of them.  We're seated at a reasonably sized conference table.  The room is well lit, and eye contact is easy to accommodate.  The content of our presentation is all verbal - no video or images required.

You'd think if ever there was a time to simply have a conversation, this would be it - but no.  My partner and the principal client contact person both made it clear they wanted a PowerPoint show.  I must admit, I was somewhat deflated.

Now, the software and format are routine for me.  This was not hard to accomplish; but all the time I was putting the file together, I was still wondering how this situation has developed to the extent it has.  Have we lost the ability to have a simple conversation?  Is the show now a part of the justification for the fees we charge.  Have our clients gotten to expect this, perhaps without knowing why?

OK, we did it, and things went well.  We had a good projector, and the lights could stay bright.  We encouraged interjected questions.  We handed out hard copy afterward, so the attendees had formal record of the proceedings.  Looking back, I must admit there were some advantages of such a simple format.

Each of our bullet points were brought in sequentially, as the presentation unfolded.  This technique kept our audience focused on the correct topic, without them jumping ahead to some other place in a handout or agenda.  Of course, if you can command attention, I suppose this could be done without all the hardware.  It's a shame, in a way.

Just another example of new technology changing how we converse.  It's like emailing your co-worker in the adjacent office.  What have we lost?

What do you think?